The Panel also states:
|
|||||
|
More Info at Our Main Site Guiding Rights
GUIDING RIGHTS: Trademarks, Copyright and the Internet, by Mark V.B. Partridge, explains the trademark and copyright principles guiding rights on the Internet in clear and accessible terms. $24.95 hard cover; $14.95 paperback "This collection of short articles on a wide range of issues of copyright and trademark law, by one of the nation's most prominent trademark lawyers, manages to convey the nuance of the subject in language that is clear and immensely readable. This is a hugely versatile book. For scholars, the book contains valuable insights; law students will come to rely on it to explain difficult concepts in easy-to-understand terms; and practioners will be scanning it for help with some of the knottiest problems around." Graeme Dinwoodie, Professor, Associate Dean and Director of the Program in Intellectual Property Law, Chicago-Kent, College of Law ORDER BOOK HERE"Guiding Rights is a unique presentation of information covering key concepts relating to the protection, enforcement and licensing of trademarks and copyrights. Mr. Partridge presents a well organized compilation of lessons that provide practical insight for understanding and handling many trademark and copyright issues that arise for companies in everyday life. Also the book discusses in a concise and effective manner the effect of significant cases from both the distant and recent past which helped shape important trademark and copyright principles." Harrie Samaras, Attorney, Chair, Committee on Intellectual Property Organizations, AIPLA ORDER BOOK HERELogin
|
Tuesday, August 19
by
Mark VB Partridge
on Tue 19 Aug 2008 10:40 AM CDT
A recent decision of ICANN UDRP panel orders transfer of domain name <mastercreditcard.com> to MasterCard, finding that "Complainant's mark is well known worldwide." MasterCard International v. Bankrate, Case No. D2008-0704 (WIPO, July 29, 2008)(Donahey, M. Scott).
The Panel also states: Respondent registered the mark at issue at a time when Complainant’s
mark had attained world wide fame, and Respondent could not have been
unaware of Complainant’s mark. Respondent used the domain name at issue
to resolve to a web site on which links to Complainant’s competitors as
well as to Complainant were posted. . . . The Panel finds ... more »
|
Mark VB Partridge
Search
Categories
This Month
Month Archive
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
|
|||