|
|||||
|
More Info at Our Main Site Guiding Rights
GUIDING RIGHTS: Trademarks, Copyright and the Internet, by Mark V.B. Partridge, explains the trademark and copyright principles guiding rights on the Internet in clear and accessible terms. $24.95 hard cover; $14.95 paperback "This collection of short articles on a wide range of issues of copyright and trademark law, by one of the nation's most prominent trademark lawyers, manages to convey the nuance of the subject in language that is clear and immensely readable. This is a hugely versatile book. For scholars, the book contains valuable insights; law students will come to rely on it to explain difficult concepts in easy-to-understand terms; and practioners will be scanning it for help with some of the knottiest problems around." Graeme Dinwoodie, Professor, Associate Dean and Director of the Program in Intellectual Property Law, Chicago-Kent, College of Law ORDER BOOK HERE"Guiding Rights is a unique presentation of information covering key concepts relating to the protection, enforcement and licensing of trademarks and copyrights. Mr. Partridge presents a well organized compilation of lessons that provide practical insight for understanding and handling many trademark and copyright issues that arise for companies in everyday life. Also the book discusses in a concise and effective manner the effect of significant cases from both the distant and recent past which helped shape important trademark and copyright principles." Harrie Samaras, Attorney, Chair, Committee on Intellectual Property Organizations, AIPLA ORDER BOOK HERELogin
|
ACPA In Rem Jurisdiction Principles
by
Mark VB Partridge
on Wed 07 Dec 2005 11:00 AM EST | Permanent Link
A decision issued by the Eastern District of Virginia on July 14, 2005,
provides a useful basis for reviewing the in rem rules under the
Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. See NBC Universal Inc. v. nbcuniversal.com, 76 USPQ2d 1370 (E.D.Va. 2005).
1, The filing of a proceeding under the ICANN UDRP does not waive the right to pursue an in rem ACPA action, either before, during or acfter the UDRP action. See Barcelona.com, Inc. v. Excelenstisimo Ayuntamiento de Barcelona, 330 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2003); Parisi v. Netlearning, Inc., 139 F.Supp.2d 745 (E.D.Va. 2001). 2. A plaintiff is not limited in bringing a civil action to the jurisdiction to which it submits under the UDRP procedures. Storey V. Cello Holdings, L.L.C., 347 F.3d 370 (2d Cir. 2003). 3. The U.S. Court need not abstain from exercising jurisdiction over the domain name in deference to an action filied by the domain name owner in a foreign jurisction. 4. In rem jurisdiction applies to infringement and dilution claims involving the domain name, as well as ACPA claims. Herrods Ltd. v. Sixty Internet Domain Name, 302 F.2d 214 (4th Cir. 2002). See also GlobalSantaFe Corp. v. Globalsantafe.com, 250 F.Supp.2d 610 (E.D.Va. 2003).
No comments found.
|
Mark VB Partridge
CONTACT INFORMATION Mark V.B. Partridge
Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP
311 S. Wacker Drive Suite 5000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
312-554-8000
Related Pages
Search
Categories
This Month
Month Archive
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
|
|||