Trademarks, Copyright and the Internet, by Mark V.B. Partridge, Partner, Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP, Chicago, Illinois

www.GuidingRights.com

More Info at Our Main Site

www.GuidingRights.com

Guiding Rights
Placing a graphic on your page
ORDER BOOK HERE

GUIDING RIGHTS: Trademarks, Copyright and the Internet, by Mark V.B. Partridge, explains the trademark and copyright principles guiding rights on the Internet in clear and accessible terms.

$24.95 hard cover; $14.95 paperback
ISBN: 0-595-65957-8

"This collection of short articles on a wide range of issues of copyright and trademark law, by one of the nation's most prominent trademark lawyers, manages to convey the nuance of the subject in language that is clear and immensely readable. This is a hugely versatile book. For scholars, the book contains valuable insights; law students will come to rely on it to explain difficult concepts in easy-to-understand terms; and practioners will be scanning it for help with some of the knottiest problems around."

Graeme Dinwoodie, Professor, Associate Dean and Director of the Program in Intellectual Property Law, Chicago-Kent, College of Law

ORDER BOOK HERE

"Guiding Rights is a unique presentation of information covering key concepts relating to the protection, enforcement and licensing of trademarks and copyrights. Mr. Partridge presents a well organized compilation of lessons that provide practical insight for understanding and handling many trademark and copyright issues that arise for companies in everyday life. Also the book discusses in a concise and effective manner the effect of significant cases from both the distant and recent past which helped shape important trademark and copyright principles."

Harrie Samaras, Attorney, Chair, Committee on Intellectual Property Organizations, AIPLA

ORDER BOOK HERE

Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
View Article  Marlon Brando Estate Recovers Domain Name

The Nation Arbitration Forum has released this decision: 

The Estate of Marlon Brando v. thewordbank twb, Claim Number: FA0506000505502,

http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/505502.htm

Panelist Hugh Putnam decides in favor of the Complainant, stating:

Respondent registered the <marlonbrando.net> domain name to prevent Complainant from reflecting its MARLON BRANDO mark in a corresponding domain name.  Furthermore, based on an article published in Artnet Magazine, Respondent has engaged in a pattern of such conduct by registering several domain names with the proper names of artists and celebrities.  These circumstances are evidence of bad faith registration and use pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(ii).  ...   more »

View Article  Good Faith Registration of missarizonausa.com Trumps Bad Faith Use

Miss Universe L.P. LLLP challenged former licensee's continued use of the domain name www.missarizonausa.com based on its rights in the marks MISS ARIZONA and MISS USA.

Miss Universe L.P., LLLP v. A Visual Group, Case No. D2005-0738

Panelist Dennis Foster denied relief, stating:

The Policy at paragraph 4(a)(iii) calls on Complainant to show bad faith in both registration and use. By Complainant’s own admission, when Respondent registered the disputed domain name in 1998, it did so with Complainant’s consent and thereafter used it to help Complainant carry on its business of organizing MISS ARIZONA beauty pageants until the license expired ...   more »

View Article  Supplemental Registration Fails To Establish Rights Under ICANN UDRP

Oil Changer, Inc. challenged registration of www.oilchanger.com based on alleged marks appearing on the U.S. Supplemental Trademark Register.

Oil Changer, Inc. v. Name Administration, Inc., Case No. D2005-0530

Panelist Richard Page denied relief, stating:

Prior WIPO panels have noted that the presumptions which arise from registration in the Principal Register are not available to registrations on the Supplemental Register.

The Panel further agrees that such registrations are an admission that the OIL CHANGER and OIL CHANGERS Marks were not inherently distinctive at the time of application for registration of the Marks and that they had not yet acquired secondary meaning. ...   more »

View Article  ICANN UDRP: Failure to Prove Bad Faith Registration

A Swiss company, Outils Rubis Ltd., challenged the domain name www.rubis.com based on its rights in RUBIS for tweezers.

Outils Rubis Ltd. v. NETPLUS Communication, Case No. D2005-0645

Panelist Geert Glas denied relief, stating:

The use of the word “and” implies that the Policy requires the Complainant to prove bad faith in both (i) the use and (ii) the registration of the disputed domain name (see amongst others WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows and WIPO Case No. D2003-0453, Paule Ka v. Paula Korenek).

In its Complaint dated June 21, 2005, the Complainant only asserts that ...   more »

View Article  Descriptive Use of "Historic Hotels" for Travel Services Deemed Legitimate Interest Under ICANN UDRP

Complainant, National Trust for Historic Preservation, owns rights in the mark HISTORIC HOTELS OF AMERICA.  Respondent offers travel services at www.historichotels.com

National Trust for Historic Preservation v. Barry Preston,  Case No. D2005-0424

A three-member Panel denies relief, stating:

It is clear that the Respondent’s website is in the nature of a general online travel site, and that the reservation services offered there are by no means restricted to establishments identified or recognized as historic hotels. Nevertheless, the Respondent claims to have adopted the domain name without awareness of the Complainant or its HISTORIC HOTELS OF AMERICA mark, the Respondent commenced ...   more »

View Article  Criticism of Trademark Owner Deemed Legitimate Interest under ICANN UDRP

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of Birmingham, Alabama, challenged registration of domain name www.biocrystpharmaceuticals.com.  Respondent used domain name to criticize the Complainant's business.

Panelist Daniel Gervais denied relief, stating:

The use of the domain name to criticize a company is prima facie fair use. The Respondent is entitled to use the Internet to exercise his free speech rights and express his opinion in this way, subject to other laws of course (copyright, fraud, libel, etc.). However, by reflecting the exact trade name and trademark of the Complainant, the Complainant argues that Respondent’s intent is to tarnish the mark. The Panel acknowledges ...   more »

View Article  Early Learning Centre Loses ICANN UDRP Case

Early Learning Centre in the UK challenged registration of the domain name www.earlylearningcentre.com by a respondent located in Viet Nam.  The respondent defaulted.

Panelist Warwick Smith denied relief, stating:

In summary, the Panel finds that the Complainant has failed to prove this part of the Complaint, for a combination of the following reasons:

1. The Respondent appears to be domiciled in Vietnam. There is no evidence of the Complainant’s mark being registered in that country, and insufficient evidence of its advertising or general reputation extending to that country.

2. The Panel is not prepared to apply any doctrine of “constructive ...   more »

View Article  Orange Bowl ICANN UDRP Case Explores Fair Use

The resale of genuine products presents particular difficulties in domain name disputes, testing the application of fair use doctrine.  Several domain name disputes involving the resale of event tickets illustrate the point.

I served as a panelist in one such case The Orange Bowl Committee, Inc. v. Front and Center Tickets, Inc.D2004-0947 (WIPO 2005).  The decision, which issued with a dissent, explored fair use in the domain name context and addressed several related ticket resale disputes.

The complainant owned rights in the ORANGE BOWL name and operated a site at www.orangebowl.org.

The respondent was an online ticket broker, and ...   more »

View Article  Wal-Mart Recovers Sam Walton Name

Panelist Scott Donahey awards Wal-Mart the domain name www.samwalton.com in this recent decision:  Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Mrs. Helen Walton v. Bestinfo/David Webb, Case No. D2005-0086 (WIPO March 25, 2005).

A key issue in UDRP actions involving personal names is the finding that the name is protectable as a common law mark, the the Policy does not provide protection for personal names per se.

The Panel finds as follows on that point:

. . . Complainant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has common law rights in the trademark SAM WALTON by virtue of its prominent and continuous use in conjunction with ...   more »

View Article  Hillary Rodham Clinton Recovers Domain Name in ICANN UDRP Action

Readers of this blog will recall that we have followed various cases involving the personal names of polictial figures.

A new decision noteworthy for the high profile of the Complainant has been issued by NAF Panelist Tyrus R. Atkinson Jr. 

The decision is available here: Hillary Rodham Clinton v. Michele Dinola (NAF March 18, 2005).

   more »
View Article  Orangebowl Prevails in ICANN UDRP Dispute

Here's a new decision focusing on the fair use of trademarks in domain names:

The Orange Bowl Committee, Inc. v. Front and Center Tickets, Inc/ Front and Center Entertainment

   more »
View Article  Licensee Knocks Out George Foreman ICANN UDRP Claim

Salton, Inc. v. George Foreman Foods, Inc., Case No. D2004-0777 (WIPO Dec. 3, 2004), demonstrates the difficulty of fighting contract disputes in the wrong forum.

Denying the Complainant's challenge to the registration and use of the domain name www.georgeforeman.com by the licensee of the name for food products, the Panel states:

Complainant acknowledged that Respondent had obtained a license from George Foreman granting Respondent the right to use the <georgeforeman.com> domain name. Indeed, Complainant attached a copy of that license agreement to its own Complaint. The license agreement grants to Respondent the right to use, among other things, “GeorgeForeman.com and all ...   more »

View Article  ICANN UDRP Claimant Lacks Common Law Rights in UTAH WEDDINGS

Keystone Publishing Inc., alleging common law trademark rights in UtahWeddings.Com, sought transfer of the domain name www.utahwedding.com owned by a competitor for wedding services in the Salt Lake area.

Although the Complainant's name had been in use since 2001, the Panel found that it lacked common law rights, stating:

In selecting the quintessentially descriptive name UtahWeddings.com for its wedding business in the State of Utah, the Complainant apparently was more interested in attracting Internet traffic than in coming up with a distinctive name. Thus, while the Complainant has a descriptive mark that attracts a large volume of casual search engine ...   more »

View Article  Robert Downey Jr. Recovers Name in ICANN UDRP Action

Well-known actor Robert Downey Jr. recovered the domain name www.robertdowneyjr.com used to redirect Internet user to clubpink.com, a site with pornographic content.

The decision, Robert Downey Jr. v. Mercedita Kyamko, WIPO D2004-0895 (Dec. 2. 2004), by Panelist John Swinson, based relief on Downey's common law rights in his name, stating:

Famous people using their name in trade and commerce can have a common law trade mark in their public name. See Julia Fiona Roberts v. Russell Boyd, WIPO Case No. D2000-0210; Van Morrison and Exile Productions Limited v. Unofficial Club de Van Morrison, WIPO Case No. D2002-0417 and Nicole Kidman ...   more »

View Article  ICANN UDRP Panel Addresses Rights in Geographic Name

Aberdeen Airport Limited, which operates the airport facility near Aberdeen Scotland, sought transfer of the domain name <aberdeenairport.com> from a respondent located in the United Arab Emirates. 

The thorough decision by Panelist Warwick Smith considers the requirements under UK law for establishing common law trademark rights in a place name.  BAA plc, Aberdeen Airport Limited v. Mr. H. Hashimi, Case No. D2004-0717 (WIPO October 21, 2004).

The case is a good example of the well-reasoned cases that require Complainants to prove common law rights to obtain relief, as opposed to merely accepting a claim of rights because the domain name ...   more »

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Free Email Newsletter
Mark VB Partridge
Placing a graphic on your page

CONTACT INFORMATION

Mark V.B. Partridge
Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP
311 S. Wacker Drive Suite 5000
Chicago, Illinois 60606

312-554-8000

Search
This Month
September 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
Year Archive